Why I Like Goodreads

Photo by John Ray Ebora from Pexels

Why I Got Goodreads

I first got a Goodreads account in 2018 which was a few years after I started publishing my own books. I was told by other indie authors that it would be a good idea to get a Goodreads account as it’s a platform designed for readers – and if an author worked it right, they could potentially connect with hundreds to thousands of interested readers. It’s a user friendly platform where people who read books can organize, review, and shelve all the books they read – and you can follow authors you like or other readers to see what they’ve been reading.

What I Like About Goodreads

It’s pretty user friendly. It’s the one app where readers and authors alike can connect, read, review, and share the books they’re reading. In theory, it seems like a great way to connect with people who could read your books (If you’re an author) and it’s fairly easy to search for books or authors using the search engine.

The reading challenges. You can set a number of books you want to read every year and Goodreads will keep track of your goal. It’s a fun way to motivate yourself to keep reading and people who enjoy meeting targets will like this feature on the app.

The ‘year in books’ feature. I love how Goodreads gives you a recap of what you’ve read over the past year and it tells you how many pages you’ve read, etc. It’s cool to look back and see all the books you’ve read over the year.

Book shelves. I like that you can have different book shelves if you want to. It also keeps track of the books you’ve read so you can go to that list anytime.

Its connected with Amazon Kindle. Some people don’t like that Amazon bought Goodreads, but what I like about this is when you write a review using the Kindle app, it posts the review on *both* Amazon and Goodreads making the process very simple.

There’s an active reading community there. I don’t take part in most of the chats or groups, but I like that it’s an option for those looking to connect with other readers. This is probably how you get to know the people on the app and gain more followers.

It links where you can buy the book. If you search for a book on Goodreads, it will show all the possible websites you can buy it from and it will direct you to the appropriate country link which is pretty nifty in my opinion.

The Cons of Goodreads

It could use some streamlining. The layout isn’t the most modern or attractive and I feel this could be the reason why a lot of people don’t use it more. While the site is user friendly, I think this lack of modern design for the site detracts all but the most excited readers. I’m not saying it has to be aesthetic, but if the website modernized itself, more people would probably use it.

The year in books isn’t shareable for WordPress (or other blogs). I wish there was a way you could share the cool collage Goodreads makes when it collects all of your books you’ve read for the year. At present, the collage is too big and you can’t scale it down to share on your blog (at least not easily). I’d love for it to have a feature where you can copy a code that shows the collage of all the books you’ve read along with all the stats that go along with them.

A lot of writers don’t use it very much. I’ve been asked by a few people on Twitter if there’s a place I post all of my book reviews together for easy viewing and I mentioned “Goodreads” and they didn’t seem too pleased. I don’t think they ever checked it out, actually. I swear it’s mostly the layout of the site that makes people go “meh” when they see it. If Goodreads could look cooler, I’m sure more authors and readers would want to use it. There’s little annoyances about it that probably prevent a lot of people from going on it more. I’d love for the shelves to be easier to find and to have cool layouts that would make other people *want* to check them out. As it stands, they’re just a basic list and not everyone wants to scroll through 50+ books to find what the author’s been reading.

This is just my two cents. Overall, I think Goodreads is a great site and it does have a good potential for readers to find great books, especially if authors are active on there. I wish that it would get a re-design, though. If it looked more modern, I’m sure more people would want to use it.

Do you use Goodreads? If so, give me a follow on there (and I’ll follow you back!) Here’s the link to my Goodreads page.

I hope you enjoyed this post! Until next time, I hope you have a great day. 🙂

9 comments

  1. I like Goodreads for the yearly challenge but one thing I don’t kike about it is all the trolls. They get right on my wick! The book world should he a nice place to be ❤

    • Yes the trolls there are nasty. Interesting you bring that up because another commenter had a bad experience being trolled, too. I was harassed by them once and accused me of creating other accounts to harass them for making 1 star reviews. I guess that’s why I don’t look at comments anymore. Sad it has to be that way. I don’t like that Goodreads isn’t supportive like that.

      • It is sad it has to be that way. I love the book community but find Goodreads not a nice place to be. I started Storygraph this year so am seeing what that’s like.

  2. Goodreads can be great, but also they are not that good in dealing with problems. I had a rather horrible email a few months ago, basically threatening me. I emailed Goodreads, but heard nothing back. I wasn’t alone and a troll was doing the same to other writers. I haven’t used it properly since. You say you don’t use the chat part of it, so you wouldn’t know it was happening.

    • Oh no I am really sorry to hear this. 😦 There’s a group on Goodreads who attacks indie authors and they’re absolutely crazy. I don’t use that term lightly, but they are bullies and they harassed me a bit in the comments, but it would be worse to get an email from them like you did. That’s sad they wouldn’t help you resolve the issue when you were clearly being bullied. It makes me view them much less favourable now knowing that they wouldn’t take it seriously.

Comments are closed.